Focusing on the brief case study TOMS Puts Its Right Foot Forward, (p. 102).
As a leader, Blake Mycoskie’s decision to make the “One for One” philosophy the central tenet for his organization brings Corporate Social Responsibility to the forefront of the company.
Thinking about the goals of the case, if you were to start a company with the “One for One” philosophy, as a leader, what decisions would you make to combine commercial objectives with social goals to improve the impact of corporate social responsibility efforts? How might the two conflict?
The post Blake Mycoskie’s decision appeared first on homework handlers.